{
  "schemaVersion": "1.0.0",
  "releaseVersion": "1.0.0",
  "releasedAt": "2026-08-04",
  "publisher": {
    "name": "Lapemo Systems LLC",
    "brand": "Large People Model",
    "url": "https://largepeoplemodel.com"
  },
  "canonicalUrl": "https://largepeoplemodel.com/framework.json",
  "canon": {
    "package": "@lpm/canon",
    "version": "0.5.0",
    "sourceRepository": "https://github.com/LayerZero69/lpm-canon.git",
    "sourceCommit": "d4d36e2fe1d1b0cebf06bbcebfff5806299e21e2"
  },
  "objects": [
    {
      "id": "lpm:layer:identity-and-incentives",
      "type": "layer",
      "slug": "identity-and-incentives",
      "title": "Identity & Incentives",
      "canonicalUrl": "https://largepeoplemodel.com/framework/identity-and-incentives",
      "version": "0.5.0",
      "status": "canonical",
      "source": "@lpm/canon@0.5.0",
      "publisher": "Lapemo Systems LLC",
      "lastUpdated": "2026-08-04",
      "relationships": [
        {
          "type": "applies_to",
          "targetId": "lpm:use-case:ai-adoption-readiness"
        },
        {
          "type": "applies_to",
          "targetId": "lpm:use-case:agent-workforce-governance"
        }
      ],
      "content": {
        "number": "01",
        "shortName": "Ownership",
        "definition": "Clarifies who owns outcomes, how accountability is assigned, and whether incentives reinforce the behavior the enterprise needs.",
        "primaryQuestion": "Who owns the outcome?",
        "whyItMatters": "AI adoption fails when everyone contributes but no one owns the result.",
        "businessProblem": "Accountability gaps and misaligned incentives prevent execution from scaling.",
        "symptoms": [
          "Everyone participates but no one is accountable.",
          "Teams optimize locally instead of enterprise-wide.",
          "AI initiatives launch without clear business owners.",
          "Strategic work slows because ownership is assumed instead of designed."
        ],
        "diagnosticQuestions": [
          "Who owns the outcome?",
          "Who can approve, pause, or redirect the work?",
          "Are incentives aligned to the enterprise goal?",
          "Where does accountability disappear between teams?"
        ],
        "artifacts": [
          "Ownership map",
          "Decision rights matrix",
          "Incentive alignment checklist",
          "AI initiative owner register"
        ],
        "aiReadinessQuestion": "Is every AI use case tied to a named accountable owner?",
        "aiRiskWhenWeak": "AI scales activity without accountability.",
        "connection": "Ownership determines who can make decisions, carry accountability, and govern outcomes across the rest of the operating model."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "lpm:layer:decision-architecture",
      "type": "layer",
      "slug": "decision-architecture",
      "title": "Decision Architecture",
      "canonicalUrl": "https://largepeoplemodel.com/framework/decision-architecture",
      "version": "0.5.0",
      "status": "canonical",
      "source": "@lpm/canon@0.5.0",
      "publisher": "Lapemo Systems LLC",
      "lastUpdated": "2026-08-04",
      "relationships": [
        {
          "type": "depends_on",
          "targetId": "lpm:layer:identity-and-incentives"
        },
        {
          "type": "applies_to",
          "targetId": "lpm:use-case:product-operating-model"
        },
        {
          "type": "applies_to",
          "targetId": "lpm:use-case:agent-workforce-governance"
        }
      ],
      "content": {
        "number": "02",
        "shortName": "Decisions",
        "definition": "Defines how decisions are made, who makes them, what information supports them, and how decisions create traceable commitments.",
        "primaryQuestion": "How are decisions made and traced?",
        "whyItMatters": "Decision debt is one of the most expensive hidden constraints in large organizations.",
        "businessProblem": "Slow, unclear, or reversible decisions create execution drag.",
        "symptoms": [
          "Decisions are revisited repeatedly.",
          "Escalations replace ownership.",
          "Teams wait for alignment meetings instead of moving.",
          "AI outputs create recommendations no one is authorized to act on."
        ],
        "diagnosticQuestions": [
          "What decisions are slowing execution?",
          "Who has the right to decide?",
          "What evidence supports the decision?",
          "How is the decision communicated and tracked?"
        ],
        "artifacts": [
          "Decision log",
          "Decision rights model",
          "Escalation map",
          "Evidence checklist"
        ],
        "aiReadinessQuestion": "Can AI-supported decisions be traced to a human decision owner?",
        "aiRiskWhenWeak": "AI creates recommendations faster than the organization can responsibly decide.",
        "connection": "Decisions create commitments. Weak decisions create communication overload and execution drift downstream."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "lpm:layer:communication-architecture",
      "type": "layer",
      "slug": "communication-architecture",
      "title": "Communication Architecture",
      "canonicalUrl": "https://largepeoplemodel.com/framework/communication-architecture",
      "version": "0.5.0",
      "status": "canonical",
      "source": "@lpm/canon@0.5.0",
      "publisher": "Lapemo Systems LLC",
      "lastUpdated": "2026-08-04",
      "relationships": [
        {
          "type": "depends_on",
          "targetId": "lpm:layer:decision-architecture"
        },
        {
          "type": "applies_to",
          "targetId": "lpm:use-case:product-operating-model"
        },
        {
          "type": "applies_to",
          "targetId": "lpm:use-case:ma-integration"
        }
      ],
      "content": {
        "number": "03",
        "shortName": "Communication",
        "definition": "Designs how information, intent, decisions, and commitments move across teams without creating noise or confusion.",
        "primaryQuestion": "How does communication create shared understanding?",
        "whyItMatters": "More communication does not create more clarity unless the architecture is intentional.",
        "businessProblem": "Communication overload creates misalignment, rework, and hidden coordination cost.",
        "symptoms": [
          "Too many meetings with unclear decisions.",
          "Important context is buried in chat.",
          "Teams communicate activity instead of commitment.",
          "Leaders cannot tell whether messages changed behavior."
        ],
        "diagnosticQuestions": [
          "What needs to be communicated, to whom, and why?",
          "Which channels carry decisions versus discussion?",
          "Where does communication fail to create shared understanding?",
          "Which meetings exist because decision rights are unclear?"
        ],
        "artifacts": [
          "Communication map",
          "Meeting architecture",
          "Decision communication protocol",
          "Channel purpose guide"
        ],
        "aiReadinessQuestion": "Can AI tools access clear, trusted communication patterns instead of fragmented noise?",
        "aiRiskWhenWeak": "AI summarizes noise and makes confusion appear organized.",
        "connection": "Communication moves decisions, context, risks, and commitments through the enterprise."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "lpm:layer:information-ecology",
      "type": "layer",
      "slug": "information-ecology",
      "title": "Information Ecology",
      "canonicalUrl": "https://largepeoplemodel.com/framework/information-ecology",
      "version": "0.5.0",
      "status": "canonical",
      "source": "@lpm/canon@0.5.0",
      "publisher": "Lapemo Systems LLC",
      "lastUpdated": "2026-08-04",
      "relationships": [
        {
          "type": "depends_on",
          "targetId": "lpm:layer:communication-architecture"
        },
        {
          "type": "applies_to",
          "targetId": "lpm:use-case:ai-adoption-readiness"
        },
        {
          "type": "applies_to",
          "targetId": "lpm:use-case:ma-integration"
        },
        {
          "type": "applies_to",
          "targetId": "lpm:use-case:platform-governance"
        }
      ],
      "content": {
        "number": "04",
        "shortName": "Information",
        "definition": "Defines how trusted information is created, maintained, accessed, refreshed, and used across the enterprise.",
        "primaryQuestion": "What information can leaders trust?",
        "whyItMatters": "AI is only as useful as the information environment it learns from and acts within.",
        "businessProblem": "Leaders cannot make confident decisions when information is duplicated, stale, conflicting, or hard to trust.",
        "symptoms": [
          "Multiple sources of truth exist for the same topic.",
          "Reports conflict across teams.",
          "Decisions rely on stale or undocumented information.",
          "AI tools retrieve plausible but unreliable context."
        ],
        "diagnosticQuestions": [
          "What information do leaders trust?",
          "Where is the source of truth?",
          "Who owns freshness and quality?",
          "Can decisions be traced back to evidence?"
        ],
        "artifacts": [
          "Source-of-truth map",
          "Information ownership register",
          "Data lineage map",
          "Knowledge freshness review"
        ],
        "aiReadinessQuestion": "Can AI retrieve trusted, current, and governed information?",
        "aiRiskWhenWeak": "AI accelerates the spread of outdated or conflicting information.",
        "connection": "Information turns communication into reusable operating memory, evidence, and decision context."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "lpm:layer:platform-structure",
      "type": "layer",
      "slug": "platform-structure",
      "title": "Platform Structure",
      "canonicalUrl": "https://largepeoplemodel.com/framework/platform-structure",
      "version": "0.5.0",
      "status": "canonical",
      "source": "@lpm/canon@0.5.0",
      "publisher": "Lapemo Systems LLC",
      "lastUpdated": "2026-08-04",
      "relationships": [
        {
          "type": "depends_on",
          "targetId": "lpm:layer:information-ecology"
        },
        {
          "type": "applies_to",
          "targetId": "lpm:use-case:product-operating-model"
        },
        {
          "type": "applies_to",
          "targetId": "lpm:use-case:ma-integration"
        },
        {
          "type": "applies_to",
          "targetId": "lpm:use-case:platform-governance"
        }
      ],
      "content": {
        "number": "05",
        "shortName": "Platforms",
        "definition": "Maps how tools, systems, workflows, and integrations shape how work actually moves through the enterprise.",
        "primaryQuestion": "Where does work actually move?",
        "whyItMatters": "Tool sprawl creates coordination debt when platforms are not intentionally structured.",
        "businessProblem": "Work fragments across systems, creating manual handoffs, duplicate effort, and poor visibility.",
        "symptoms": [
          "Teams use different tools for the same workflow.",
          "Work moves through manual handoffs.",
          "Platform ownership is unclear.",
          "Leaders cannot see the real operating flow."
        ],
        "diagnosticQuestions": [
          "Which platforms carry critical work?",
          "Where does work leave one system and enter another?",
          "Who owns the platform workflow?",
          "Which tools duplicate or conflict with each other?"
        ],
        "artifacts": [
          "Platform map",
          "Workflow inventory",
          "Integration map",
          "Tool rationalization worksheet"
        ],
        "aiReadinessQuestion": "Can AI operate across platforms with clear ownership, integration, and controls?",
        "aiRiskWhenWeak": "Governed agents act across fragmented systems without reliable operating boundaries.",
        "connection": "Platforms operationalize work, decisions, information, and governance through tools and workflows."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "lpm:layer:governance-architecture",
      "type": "layer",
      "slug": "governance-architecture",
      "title": "Governance Architecture",
      "canonicalUrl": "https://largepeoplemodel.com/framework/governance-architecture",
      "version": "0.5.0",
      "status": "canonical",
      "source": "@lpm/canon@0.5.0",
      "publisher": "Lapemo Systems LLC",
      "lastUpdated": "2026-08-04",
      "relationships": [
        {
          "type": "depends_on",
          "targetId": "lpm:layer:platform-structure"
        },
        {
          "type": "applies_to",
          "targetId": "lpm:use-case:ai-adoption-readiness"
        },
        {
          "type": "applies_to",
          "targetId": "lpm:use-case:platform-governance"
        },
        {
          "type": "applies_to",
          "targetId": "lpm:use-case:agent-workforce-governance"
        }
      ],
      "content": {
        "number": "06",
        "shortName": "Governance",
        "definition": "Defines the controls, policies, review loops, and decision boundaries that keep execution safe without slowing it unnecessarily.",
        "primaryQuestion": "How is risk controlled without freezing execution?",
        "whyItMatters": "Governance should create trust and speed, not theater and delay.",
        "businessProblem": "Governance is either too slow to support execution or too weak to manage risk.",
        "symptoms": [
          "Approvals are unclear or excessive.",
          "Policy exceptions are hard to track.",
          "Governance happens after work is already in motion.",
          "AI use cases scale before controls are defined."
        ],
        "diagnosticQuestions": [
          "What must be governed?",
          "Who approves exceptions?",
          "Which controls are preventive versus reactive?",
          "Where does governance slow execution without reducing risk?"
        ],
        "artifacts": [
          "Governance decision tree",
          "Control map",
          "Risk acceptance register",
          "AI governance checklist"
        ],
        "aiReadinessQuestion": "Are AI decisions, exceptions, and controls visible enough to govern?",
        "aiRiskWhenWeak": "AI scales faster than oversight, auditability, and risk ownership.",
        "connection": "Governance sets the operating boundaries for safe, scalable, and trusted execution."
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "lpm:layer:ai-amplification",
      "type": "layer",
      "slug": "ai-amplification",
      "title": "AI Amplification",
      "canonicalUrl": "https://largepeoplemodel.com/framework/ai-amplification",
      "version": "0.5.0",
      "status": "canonical",
      "source": "@lpm/canon@0.5.0",
      "publisher": "Lapemo Systems LLC",
      "lastUpdated": "2026-08-04",
      "relationships": [
        {
          "type": "depends_on",
          "targetId": "lpm:layer:governance-architecture"
        },
        {
          "type": "applies_to",
          "targetId": "lpm:use-case:ai-adoption-readiness"
        },
        {
          "type": "applies_to",
          "targetId": "lpm:use-case:platform-governance"
        },
        {
          "type": "applies_to",
          "targetId": "lpm:use-case:agent-workforce-governance"
        }
      ],
      "content": {
        "number": "07",
        "shortName": "AI Amplification",
        "definition": "Determines whether AI improves the operating model or amplifies the dysfunction already inside it.",
        "primaryQuestion": "Will AI amplify clarity or chaos?",
        "whyItMatters": "AI does not remove the need for ownership, decisions, communication, information, platforms, or governance. It magnifies their quality.",
        "businessProblem": "AI pilots create activity but fail to become trusted enterprise capability.",
        "symptoms": [
          "Many AI pilots, few scaled outcomes.",
          "AI use cases lack owners, controls, and adoption paths.",
          "Agents automate fragmented workflows.",
          "Leaders cannot tell whether AI improved the operating model or just accelerated work."
        ],
        "diagnosticQuestions": [
          "What is AI amplifying?",
          "Who owns the AI-supported outcome?",
          "What decisions can AI support versus make?",
          "How are AI actions monitored and governed?"
        ],
        "artifacts": [
          "AI readiness assessment",
          "Agent accountability checklist",
          "Human-in-the-loop model",
          "AI use case governance register"
        ],
        "aiReadinessQuestion": "Will AI amplify clarity or chaos?",
        "aiRiskWhenWeak": "AI makes the hidden operating model more powerful before it is understood.",
        "connection": "AI touches every layer and amplifies the quality, clarity, or dysfunction of the system underneath it."
      }
    }
  ]
}